Reproductive endocrinologists have a new challenge as the number of women seeking to terminate their pregnancies has risen and the cost of a surgical procedure to prevent a fertilized egg from implanting has been skyrocketing.
But they say there’s no easy answer.
The issue has become so important that there is a growing body of research examining whether there is another option.
“In the past, it was really hard to know what was best for a woman,” said Dr. Amy D’Angelo, president and chief executive officer of the Canadian Association of Reproductive Endocrinologists, a group of reproductive endocrinology specialists.
“What is the right answer?
I think the answer is, there are different answers.
It is really hard for a clinician to make that judgment.”
The costs of ending a pregnancy In the United States, a fertilization procedure called in vitro fertilization can cost as much as $3,000, with a waiting period of up to five years.
But it is not illegal in Canada to perform the procedure.
The procedure has been around for more than a century.
“The reason the procedure has continued to be so widely practiced in the U.S. is because it’s a relatively cheap procedure,” said Elizabeth J. Miller, a reproductive endocrine surgeon at the University of Toronto and a reproductive biologist.
“It’s a cheap procedure.
It’s a quick procedure.
There’s no real need to have multiple or longer-term follow-up to get a definitive diagnosis.”
The procedure, which involves injecting the egg with sperm, typically takes place in a hospital.
After the fertilized ovum implants, it is harvested and stored in a lab for further study.
For more information, visit www.canadianreproductivehealth.ca/about-health-and-fertility.
“There’s no question that if you can do the procedure at home, it’s the best choice for women who want to terminate a pregnancy, especially if you want to do it with a young woman,” Dr. Miller said.
The surgery can also be performed in clinics or home and cost as little as $100.
The cost of the procedure varies by province and city, with some hospitals paying for it for patients with insurance or with their own money.
Dr. D’ Angelo said that it is still a relatively inexpensive procedure, with women who cannot afford a full-time job often being able to do the surgery on a limited budget.
However, there is still an issue with the amount of time that patients spend in the hospital, she said.
“Women are still in a really good position to have the surgery,” she said, adding that a majority of women who undergo the procedure report it improved their health.
“When it comes to infertility, it makes sense to have a surgical option to have that option.”
However, women may still be reluctant to try the procedure, given the stigma associated with the procedure and the increased costs associated with it.
Some people who perform in vitro fusions have had negative experiences and are not willing to participate in the procedure for fear of being labeled a “sexual deviant,” said David Mazzoni, an obstetrician and gynecologist at the McMaster University Hospital in Hamilton.
“If they think you are a sexual deviant, they don’t want you there,” he said.
A recent study published in the journal Reproductive Medicine, however, found that those who reported their sexual orientation as bisexual or homosexual were more likely to report difficulty having an abortion.
In Canada, there were more than 1,400 reported sexual orientation-related abortions in 2015, according to the Canadian Centre for Health Information.
According to the study, more than half of the abortions were performed in rural areas and fewer than two-thirds of them were performed on women in rural Ontario.
Some of the reasons for this discrepancy in the incidence of abortion may be due to the stigma surrounding abortion, said Dr